Patriot Coal, a misnomer if ever there
was one. It may even rise to the level of oxymoron. It seems that
this company was born out of the detritus of Peabody Energy Company
when it sought to remove the less profitable divisions from its
balance sheet. In the process the company born with negatives in the
balance sheet proceeded to lose profitability and has now been
through bankruptcy proceedings and has been successful in unloading
much of the pension liabilities of Peabody Energy and Arch Coal. It
is a good strategy, or perhaps I should say an effective strategy
having been used by the auto industry and others when it became
apparent that they could not both give stockholders dividends and
appreciating stock values while living up to their promises to the
people who gave their lives generating those profits. It is a
deplorable attempt to place the retirements and health benefits of
thousands of people in the same class with utility and material costs
and simply declare them null and void through the bankruptcy process.
Oh, like the other creditors the pensioners will receive cents on
the dollar in settlement it will do nothing to secure their security
in retirement thereby inevitably placing the load on the American
taxpayer. Patriots, indeed. Like Washington, Jefferson, Hamilton,
Jackson and Franklin. No, not the ones who founded this republic but
more like the ones that grace our folding money. It is a despicable
way to do business.
But this is not the only way in which
Patriot Coal is failing to act like a good citizen. You know,
corporations are citizens just like anyone else if you adhere to the
definition of our Supreme Court who held that position in the
Citizens United case. Difference is if we get caught tossing a trash
bag in the creek it is money out of our pockets but Patriot Coal is
attempting to avoid the costs that amount to hundreds of millions of
dollars for the massive trashing of the mountains and the water
supply incurred during the mining operations. If they are
successful, and if history is any indication they will be, the costs
will fall on, you guessed it, the citizens of the United States of
America. In the parlance of country music, “they got the money, we
got the shaft.” To hear the legislators and coal executives tell
it the Environmental Protection Administration and this radical,
liberal Obama administration are waging a war on coal that will
result in widespread unemployment and depression of the minefields.
If the despoiling of Kentucky's resources and loss of benefits are
part of the way Patriot Coal does business then there needs to be a
war, not just on coal but on the illegal way they do business. This
is the way that the coal industry has avoided the true costs of
burning the black rock. By moving the environmental costs onto the
backs of the American citizen. Just another way that corporate
socialism is OK.
This is just one instance of how
corporate America is ripping off the American public. These monied
giants understand the value inherent in spending millions of dollars
to lobby our representatives in Congress to pass favorable
legislation that is very often written by the entities being
regulated. In any other area such action would be called bribery but
those receiving the money say that it has no influence on their vote
and those spending the money swear they have the public's welfare at
heart so it can't be bribery.
After the Wall Street crash that took
the world economy into the tank one would think that those
responsible would be contrite and at least promise to do better.
Think again. When our Congress sat down to write regulations to
ensure that this could never happen again those banks and hedge funds
were the first in line with millions of dollars to educate those
Senators and Representative on the niceties of how we needed those
behemoths to create wealth and jobs for our economy that they drove
into the ditch. And those guys and gals fell for it. There are some
very simple proposals, the Volcker proposal for one, that would
greatly diminish the damage that failure of one of those giants could
once again require the American Taxpayer to cover its losses. One of
them would require that those banks keep a larger percentage of
capital reserves to cover losses but they don't want to do that since
it means they can't use that money to make more money. I don't
really care if they lose money but I certainly don't want the
taxpayer to be on the hook for it. So, are these guys working on
behalf of the people of the United States or on behalf of their
stockholders? It should be obvious and yet we have a significant
number of our representatives who do the shilling for these banks.
So, is anyone in Washington DC talking
about what we can do to help the people who have lost their jobs,
health benefits and pensions and who will likely never again be
employed at the same pay grade? If they are I'm not hearing it.
What I hear is our representatives still arguing over who we should
blame for Benghazi. Not over who to blame for it happening but who
to blame for not having the gift of foresight in explaining what
happened. Or what about the IRS ruckus in which some staffers used
the words “Tea Party” or “Patriot” as keywords to flag groups
asking for tax exemption under the 501 C(4) statute. For crying out
loud, this is what they are supposed to do. And now the revelation
that the NSA is collecting data of the same sort that any other
business collects as if we didn't know that was already happening.
Rand Paul says it is as bad as King George but then he is given to
statements of hyperbole. If anyone ever looked at the Patriot
(there's that word again) Act this revelation would be no surprise at
all. Now, personally, I don't like it but I said that ten years ago
and no one paid attention.
We all know what the problem is here
and it begins with a group of people with megaphones who can control
the temperature of the national debate. Don't think they don't have
an agenda because they most certainly do. This problem lies with a
group of people in Congress who will refuse any attempt at any
legislation that carries the approval of the President even if they
originally proposed it. And the problem lies with an electorate that
has been swayed by the shrill voices with diversionary tactics.
So, that's my take on the way things
are. I don't know if we can return to sanity before disaster strikes
or not. We certainly need for cooler heads to prevail and for the
impertinent kids to be put in time out.
No comments:
Post a Comment