A
Pastoral Message
In what is perhaps the most significant
example to date of how Christian faith in America has degraded into a
pseudo-faith evinced mainly by a civil type of religion that is more
known for its political views are some of the remarks made concerning
Pope Francis' messages in the United States. This Pope has brought a
new level of compassion and humility to the Catholic Church that has
long been absent and maybe never present. Other than his
accessibility to the least of these he spoke in the halls of power of
servanthood and fealty to the plight of our fellow travelers. In
some cases he was accused of bringing a political message by those
who seem to be more familiar with the civil form of religion than the
faith form.
Some thought that he should have taken
a more vocal stance against abortion. This Pope certainly is not
going to come out as Pro-Choice but neither is he going to completely
write of a person who, in his eyes, has committed a grave sin. His
teaching is that after confession that person should be allowed to
take the sacrament which seems to be what The Master taught. This
brought a great hue and cry from those who, in the practice of their
civil religion, want government to legislate what a sinner and God
can do. This is not to say that government may not legislate but it
suggests that the matter is best left up to the sinner and God and
that forgiveness is far more important than we realize.
He spoke on climate change and seemed
to indicate that he believes that is happening largely as a result of
human actions. His point was that as stewards of God's creation we
have a certain obligation to use it for the common good of His
people. He suggested that from those to whom much has been given,
much is expected in dealing with the impending crisis. Many who
disdain the science and unilateral action complained that he should
stick to religious matters that fit comfortably into the practice of
civil religion.
I listened to many commentators who
struggled to get their heads wrapped around his messages because they
just did not have a grasp of what a spiritual message is. I wanted
to yell at them to go to church, a church that preaches and teaches
love, forgiveness and compassion rather than one that organizes
political rallies to show candidates how many votes are there. It is
the lack of understanding of the basic message of faith that
indicates the civil religion that places faith on a par with
government.
His message about migration was that we
should stretch out our arms to those who are fleeing privation. A
message totally at odds with what we hear and see from those seeking
political power. They claim that is just not workable or practical
which is the same thing I once heard an old deacon say about public
confession. It is workable and practical if we are willing to, in
his words, humble ourselves and share what we have. Still, I expect
that his message will fall on selfish and deaf ears. Oh, some will
heed and I am convinced that hearing that message was at least
partially responsible for the opening of Speaker Boehner's eyes and
his subsequent resignation.
Then the Pope blew off a fancy dinner
with V.I.P.s and went to eat with the homeless. He went to visit
prisoners. Things just unheard of in our status conscious lives and
it made the rest of us look like dirty rags.
What I am trying to say is that to one
who is in tune with his faith these were mere pastoral messages but
to those who practice the civil religion it sounds like blasphemy.
And then he was off to Rome but his
message will resonate. Some lives will be changed but most will
return to their familiar. But, it is not an alien message. It is
preached every day somewhere.
I am not Catholic and never have been.
I do, however, profess Christianity but it was not necessary to be a
believer to access the wealth in these messages. It should, however,
give one a leg up.
My Take is that as a commentator on
public affairs I try to steer clear of religious topics for obvious
reasons, not the least of which is my profound belief of the
propriety of separation of church and state. I violated that rule
in this case because of the message of how we are to relate to our
compatriots. A lesson for the ages.
No comments:
Post a Comment