I've been seeing some reports of people
calling the FBI inept, corrupt and other names for failing to connect
the dots in the recent Florida school shooting. Personally, I think
it is just an attempt to deflect growing criticism of gun laws that
do nothing to ameliorate gun attacks in schools and elsewhere and may
actually provide greater opportunity for those attacks. Upon
consideration of the criticism of the FBI it seems that perhaps the
expectation is too great. Consider, in a nation that has some 300
million weapons that are only limited by the ban on automatic weapons
we ask a law enforcement agency to sift through the thousands of tips
they receive and determine which ones are likely to proceed to
attacks. This without doing the kind of surveillance that the FBI is
accused of doing right now for political purposes. How would you
feel if out of the blue the FBI came knocking at your door asking
questions about your weapons, political leanings and governmental
philosophy? Given the spate of “swatting” in which someone calls
in on 911 and says there is gunfire at a residence and the SWAT team
shows up and knocks your door in just think how mere accusation could
lead to remonstrance and demonstration against you.
Yes, it does seem that the FBI missed
the boat on this one but can we really expect them to do that job
well in a populace that effectively has no gun prohibitions or is
that just a way to shift blame from ourselves to a faceless
governmental agency? I suggest the latter.
Polling shows that a majority of
Americans realize that some form of gun regulation is necessary but
there is still a large segment that is unnaturally attached to their
guns without logical reason. Nobody is suggesting that we make
private possession of weapons illegal. What we are suggesting is
that there is no reasonable civilian reason to possess some types of
firearms. In reality those that are referred to as assault weapons
are
little different from other semi-automatic weapons. What makes
them different is their capability of firing dozens of rounds before
reloading. Some hunting rifles do this. Most semi-automatic
handguns have a 9 shot magazine which may be too large. I suggest
limiting rifle magazines to 5 rounds. My 30/30 rifle holds 5 rounds
and each round must be individually loaded into an interior magazine.
I can't do that in less that a couple of minutes which is an
eternity in a school shooting. Even at that this is the type of
weapon that was used in the Texas Tower Shooting 50 or so years ago.
Some Glocks have extended magazines that hold 22 rounds. This is the
weapon that was used to shoot Congressman Giffords and kill several
in Arizona. That's just crazy. There is no rational reason for
that kind of murderous capacity. These kinds of things can be
limited and still allow people to own their precious weapons.
The only thing that is really going to
do the trick is to decrease the number of available weapons. “If we
prohibit guns then only the bad guys will have guns!” Even this is
not a perfect solution. To decrease the number of weapons we are
going to have to realize that it is not going to happen overnight.
It will take years for weapons laws to have the desired effect of
reducing guns but it is a beginning. Gun laws can immediately reduce
the number of weapons being bought and, over time, remove them from
the clutches of the bad guys. Look at this for a minute. It is not
criminals that are perpetrating the carnage. It is the people that
we encounter at Kroger or the mall. It is the kid that your kid
knows. Who knows what goes on the mind of the mass murderer? They
look like us. The shooter and attorney.
Be sensible! We are going to have to
have a multi-pronged approach. Limits on magazines, tracking
ammunition the way we would track guns, better insight into the mind
of a mass murderer and better regulation of gun purchases. The gun
manufacturers will howl but this is about their business model.
They
have to sell guns to make money and therein lies one of the problems.
The gun manufacturers are the chief source of funding for the NRA
which is a major donor to political campaigns. It is a death lobby
and our representatives are complicit in perpetrating the carnage.
Eventually it is us. Can we be trusted to put the welfare of our
country and our children ahead of our own passions and desires? Can
we be rational and accept that there are some weapons that we just
don't need? For the sake of our country and our sanity.
My Take is that a lot of people are
delusional and will not do the serious thinking about this issue.
They will prefer to allow their infatuation with tools of death to
sway their intellect.