“I am troubled”, she said.
“I hear those of you who are not
conservative calling me and people like me bad names and showing
disrespect toward people of faith, such as myself.”
“But I hear exactly the opposite” I
replied. “I hear progressives being called names such as “libtard”
and “snowflake” but I don't believe I've heard terms like these
applied to conservatives. To me, it seems that every form of
disrespect and ridicule has been leveled against progressives and
liberals.”
But what you must understand my friend
said is that we have little choice. One candidate was openly hostile
to my faith while the other one opened his administration to our
voice. We found both candidates to be unacceptable but only one
espoused the worldview that we hold.
Don't forget, I said, that I am a
member of that community of faith and I did not find my candidate to
be hostile to my faith. As a matter of fact I know her to be a woman
of faith herself. A Methodist I believe. But even at that can one
accept that the President can be a promoter of faith given the
hateful speech we hear come from his mouth and the actions of his
administration? Does that not give the lie to being a person of
faith or does that not matter?
Should I then prefer a person who
favors abortion and keeps matters of faith separate from his office?
Should I prefer a person who is against the things that matter to me
simply because of the tone of his speech?
Perhaps we are not talking about what
needs to be talked about, I said. Perhaps we should be talking about
the responsibility of government to faith based endeavors. Maybe we
should be talking about whether or not it is the responsibility of
government to intercede in cases of abortion. Should we be allowing
displays of faith in our public affairs when we have so many citizens
of different faiths or do we prefer a particular one?
No comments:
Post a Comment