I have a pet peeve. Well, to be
truthful, I have several. But this one involves my business and what
happens to the fees levied by the state to enforce regulations
governing it. I believe in regulation as long as it is applied
evenly. If it is done that way then the playing field is leveled and
simple market forces drive competition. If it is not applied evenly
then it places a burden on those most unable to sustain it and gives
an edge to larger companies who have the cash flow to factor it in.
With my business I pay about $1000 per
year to maintain licenses. I take time to do continuing education
and I maintain business liability insurance per regulations. In
addition, often there are permitting fees and inspection fees. The
lion's share of those levies go to the department having
jurisdiction. Those fees are to be used for enforcement and
departmental overhead but each year me and my fellow business
operators pay far more to those departments than is required. As a
matter of fact, we paid licensing fees for over ten years to one
department that did not perform one bit of regulatory duty. The
excess fees are to be used for operations that would benefit the
license holder or the public such as education or reduced fees to the
license holder. But what really happens is that each year the
Governor issues an executive order that confiscates those excess fees
and places them into the general fund which is used to fund the
operations of state government.
Here is my question and my peeve. Is
this a fee or is this a tax? In my opinion, once the money is
scooped up by the Governor then it becomes a tax. Up until then it
is a fee. This is a tax that is never debated, never voted on and
never sees the scrutiny of any legislative eye. When compared to the
recent brouhaha over the library tax this executive exercise of power
puts that accusation to shame. At least that tax was legislated even
if in an obscure way.
I can live with this. I should not
have to but I can as long as it is applied equitably which it is not.
The burden falls heaviest on the small contractor while, as I said,
the large contractor finds it easier to absorb the associated costs.
Philosophically, and I believe all
political thought should have a sound philosophical basis, I disagree
with the way this and many other taxes are levied. I believe that we
cannot have good government without having the means of financing
that government debated. In so many things we fund government with
fees that are little more than hidden taxes and that has a profound
effect on not just our taxation rates but also operations of
government that are funded by these hidden taxes.
I am not a small government advocate.
I believe that government should be large enough to accomplish the
many goals of a complicated society including regulation and the
provisions of our Social Contract. I just believe that those funding
methods should be debated along with the efficacy of the legislation
they are dedicated to serve.
For instance, I do not believe that the
excess fees of my department should be moved to the general fund to
make it easier for our legislators to fund government without raising
taxes. We make it too easy on our legislators to avoid
responsibility and we make it too easy on the voter to avoid
responsibility for his or her demands. If we are going to demand
stricter enforcement of some laws then we have to accept the
responsibility for funding it. If we are going to expand medical
care then we must accept responsibility for funding it. If we are
going to put police patrols in schools then we must accept
responsibility for funding it. If we have decided that drunk drivers
are a public hazard then we must accept responsibility for funding
their incarceration and policing. If we want our children to be
educated then we have to accept responsibility for funding it. If we
want to fight wars in which only a few percent of us will ever see
battle then we have to fund it. If we want to have an economy that
uses fossil fuels to generate power then we have to fund it. And not
only it but the cleanup of the mess.
Everything has its costs and we must
accept responsibility for the true costs of that item and that
includes things such as waste dumps, dealing with the global climate
change resulting from the use of fossil fuels and the treatment of
men and women we bring home suffering from PTSD and horrible battle
wounds. For way too long we have pretended that we can enjoy our
cake but never clean up the kitchen. Attention to this would cause
us to be more responsible with legislation and would make us act like
adults.
When our representatives decide to act
on a subject to regulate it we need to be told how much it is going
to cost. We don't need to vote on everything but we need to know who
did. Personally, I am willing to accept a significant increase in
personal taxation to fund the kind of society I believe in. I am not
going to throw out of office a representative who votes for
legislation simply because I don't want to pay for it. Most of us
make decisions from time to time that don't pan out and I would hate
to be pilloried for every mistake I have made. But I am willing to
be held responsible for the way I live my life and attend to those
things in my care.
I am an advocate of universal health
care along with quite a few other social programs. In truth, I would
much rather pay for them than the decade long war we are pouring our
treasure and lives into. Taxation is a necessary part of any nation
that enjoys a Social Contract and we have a great nation and a great
contract. Certainly there are some who are not carrying their weight
and some who carry more than they should but if we attend to our
responsibilities that will be minimized. Nobody in our country makes
it to the top alone. In every way we enjoy the efforts of our fellow
citizens and their taxation.
Now, this is just a part of my take on
taxation and it's purposes. As I said, I believe that political
thought should have a sound philosophical basis. One of the great
things about philosophy is that people have been doing it for a long
time and it doesn't require a degree to do it. It does, however,
help to be aware of some of the roads already traveled.
No comments:
Post a Comment