I am glad to report that this time next
week, barring some disaster, we will have another Presidential
election in the bank and we will be able to get on with our normal
criticisms and bickering. I don't know if it is just weariness at
the constant sniping or if I am just getting old and tired of it.
Perhaps both. But, at least, in a weeks time perhaps all of the
political ads, negative and otherwise, will be over for another year
or two.
We have some serious business to attend
to. The euphemistically named “fiscal cliff” will be upon us.
Without some kind of budget deal the automatic cuts programmed into a
previous debate will kick in removing $500 billion from each of the
military budget and social programs over the next decade. It was set
up to be so severe so that the budget negotiators would be terrified
of it but they were more terrified of having to go tell their
constituents they needed to lighten up a little bit. I've said it
before but is being elected such a big deal that one would forsake
his duty to the nation just to uphold his intransigence? I suppose
just having to ask that question answers it.
Everyone knows that we are going to
have to have a combination of both spending cuts and new revenues.
The numbers just don't work any other way. I don't have that big a
problem with cutting our obese defense budget and others feel the
same way about our social programs. The other side of the coin
though is that cutting that much from only a couple of sources would
put hundreds of thousands if not millions of people out of work and
would likely drop us into recession again. The federal government
and the national deficit are NOT just like your checkbook no matter
what you are told by the simpletons on television. Like it or not,
all federal spending is stimulating to the economy just by its
nature. In terms of economic impact spending on salaries for our
military is no different than spending federal dollars on a new
bridge. Both employ people using tax receipts. So, if we stop
spending we don't just save that money. On the other end we don't
generate that money so it is not like your checkbook. If you
don't spend money then you save it. If the government doesn't spend
it then jobs are not created on the other end.
The Great Recession has caused tax
receipts to plummet and that has created much of our budget deficit.
We need to employ people to generate more tax receipts and, let's
face it, only large corporations, the 1 % and our government have
access to that kind of money. In fact, those large corporations are
sitting on trillions of dollars they could be using to invest in our
country hoping to get a better deal after the election.
Our economy is transitioning from a
manufacturing economy to a service economy and we have to have
workers ready to step into the jobs in the new economy. These jobs
will require more education that previous jobs and skills our
workforce does not have. How will we deal with that unless
government steps in to help train those people. The alternative is
to drop farther into a third world economy then we will be
competitive with Mexico and China. Not good for the American
consumer.
If we are to export anything then we
will have to decide what it is that we can export that the rest of
the world can't export just as cheaply. We still have an edge in
technology and innovation but we desperately need mathematicians and
engineers to work there. Now we are importing those skills from the
rest of the world because we have not educated enough to serve the
domestic market. In the old economy that would work because our
businesses had a captive market. Now with a global economy that is
not so. The market is world wide and we have to compete world wide.
There are ways to do that but those
ways require some direction from government rather than just allowing
demand to create the impetus for change. Germany still has a strong
industrial and manufacturing base even though their products are
costly. The reason is the world renowned German engineering.
Germany uses a system of trade schools and partnerships with business
to train workers. This model alone will not work for the United
States but it can be part of the plan. Germany has a population of
about 81.5 million and the United States has a population of over 350
million. We will have to have multiple plans and there is no single
entity that can lead this transformation other than government. To
me, this is plain to see. To others loyalty to worn out ideologies
carry the day.
It appears that the President will win
reelection but not by a large number. The House of Representatives
will remain in Republican hands while the Democratic Party will carry
the Senate but not with a filibuster proof majority. One of the
things that absolutely needs to be done is to rewrite the rules to
allow for a majority of votes to pass legislation at some point. It
is just insane to require a super-majority of 60 to pass the simplest
of acts and it has created paralysis in Congress.
Very few are going to get everything
they want. All of us are going to have to give a little to get a
little and that is the biggest change of all. Let's try to get
behind our elected leaders and let them know we won't necessarily
fire them if they compromise but that we will certainly fire them if
they won't.
No comments:
Post a Comment