I don't know what the allure is of
guns. I know that I am subject to it and own two that are very
rarely fired other than my .22 for shooting at varmints. I hardly
ever hit them. Maybe it is something about the power, I just don't
know yet. I can understand sportsmen who enjoy hunting and I can
even understand collectors but I have a difficult time understanding
why anyone would actually need an assault type weapon. Why does any
law abiding sportsman need a 30 round magazine. First, if you can't
hit your target in 5 or 6 shots you need some practice. Secondly, if
you empty the magazine you have endangered everything and everyone in
your vicinity. By the same token, why would anyone ever require more
than an 8 or 9 shot magazine in a handgun. If you haven't protected
yourself by the time that clip is expended you are more than likely
dead. Sure, arguments can be made in favor of those large clips but
not very good ones. The question is whether or not we are willing to
give up a little to mitigate the chances of such a massacre as the
one in Connecticut. Notice I did not say “stop” because smaller
magazines do not insure a cessation of multiple deaths. It only
lessens the chance that 26 will be killed. Just like the shooting
when Gabby Giffords was shot and that little girl was killed.
Someone would have gotten shot anyway but someone might have not been
shot. The large clips are just not necessary.
I know that as Americans we are not
going to give up personal ownership of firearms. We are just not
made that way. I know that it is the shooter who does the act and
not the gun. But it only makes sense that we can do some things that
can help. In almost all of the mass murders we can think of there
are two commonalities, large clips and irrational or mentally
disturbed people. In a free society it will be hard to eliminate
acts of mentally disturbed people but we can eliminate large clips.
Will it stop the shootings? Probably not. Will it decrease the
numbers of casualties. Probably so. We will not know until we try.
I read recently that Japan had only two gun deaths last year. We had
177,154. Now, you tell me what the difference is. Can we cut that
in half?
The other thing is we have no idea
where the guns are going. One thing I am absolutely certain of is
that large corporations understand their markets if they are
successful. When was the last time you heard of a gun manufacturer
going out of business? They know that immense numbers of these
weapons are being diverted to illegal uses but they still do nothing
to control that and we do nothing to legislate that control. We
would have to be idiots to think that all those guns are being
stashed for family protection and hunting. But, just as the drug
companies are in the business of making money so are the gun
manufacturers in the business of making money. I don't know if one
of the answers is a more efficient accounting of weapons or if gun
registration would work but I do know that it would help. Look, it
goes against my grain to have to register firearms but it just could
be that we will have to make that a part of the defense of our
public. If you are still harboring any hopes that you could use your
Bushmaster to defend yourself against an intrusive government you
need to wake up. That is just not going to work any more. It is too
late for that. You might be able to take a few pot shots at a drone
before it dropped a hellfire missile in your pocket but you will
still be dead.
Fact is, we are going to have to do
something and it is not going to be just one thing. There is no
magic bullet that will turn us into a nation of rational,
non-murderous beings. We are just going to have to try some things
to see if they work. If they do then great. If not, then we will
have to do something else but what we can't do is accept the carnage
that is going on at this time. The greater harm is that we will
expect a more intrusive police presence and will gradually allow our
freedoms to be eroded. Already we have cameras on the streets, eyes
in the sky, monitoring of e-mail and social networking sites all done
in the name of assuaging our fears.
Possibly our schools will become more
fortified. It is a shame because schools have long been considered
community property and have served as the focus of community
activities. We are more disturbed when our children are threatened.
They hold the keys to our futures and our aspirations but the schools
are not the only venues for acts of violence. Movie theaters,
shopping malls and any other place where people gather to make an
easy target serve the crazed gunman quite well. In our cities the
streets of depressed neighborhoods make a fertile ground for gang
related shootings. There will not be one solution to this twenty
first century bane. Better control of weapons, better access to
mental health counseling, school security and improved economic
opportunity can all be parts of a plan to reduce violence.
Unfortunately, we crave simple solutions but such solutions are
rarely successful or even available.
In the case of the murders in
Connecticut the weapons used were appropriately bought and
registered. The handlers of those weapons were well instructed in
the safe and appropriate use of those weapons and those weapons were
used for the purpose for which they were constructed. Acts of
killing. We can argue about weapons being used appropriately for
protection, hunting and other recreation but it remains that their
purpose is destructive. Adam Lanza had been instructed by his mother
in the proper use of firearms but it remains that without access to
those weapons the deaths would not have occurred.
It is not possible for us to discern
the proclivities of every troubled mind and a free society has to
accept some risk. It is possible for us to take the many steps we
can in order to create a more peaceful society. Our society accepts
violence as a remedy and even glorifies it if it suits us. Many
things in our society inure us to the use of violence. I won't try
to enumerate them here but we must look inside ourselves to find what
violence we can root out. Whatever we do, it still will not be
enough to protect us from ourselves.
No comments:
Post a Comment